CTS Imaging vs Traditional Film Positives: 
What Screen Printers Are Choosing in 2025

Title

Introduction

The exposure process in screen printing is notably a delicate, important, and at times tedious process. It can be easy to overexpose or underexpose your screen, forcing you to restart from the beginning. Currently the two most common methods are traditional film positives (the legacy method) and CTS (Computer-to-Screen) Imaging. Film positives have been the standard way to transfer artwork to a screen for multiple decades and are still readily used to this day. CTS imaging, on the other hand, is a digital process that allows the artwork to directly be imaged onto the screen without film. What we want to know is: what are screen printers going with in 2025? Let’s look further as to which technology is preferred and why. 

Film Positive (Traditional Exposure Process)

The traditional exposure process transforms digital artwork into physical stencils through a multi-step process of prep, exposure, and development. 

  • Preparation – This is where the digital artwork is printed onto film. Each color requires its own film positive with enough opacity to block UV light. 
  • Coating – Screens are now coated with emulsions ready for the exposure process. 
  • Registration & Exposure – The emulsion-coated screen is now placed in a UV exposure unit, where the main process happens. 
  • Development – Emulsions are washed away with water, leaving the final stencil. 

Pros & Cons

Film Positive exposure units are considerably cheaper than CTS imaging systems, making them the go-to for almost every startup shop. They’re cost-effective for small volume jobs, and don’t bring the learning curve that comes with digital systems. 

 

For every set of advantages there will be some concessions, and the traditional method is no different. The most obvious disadvantage would be the need for restocking consumables. However, we shouldn’t overlook the labor requirements, extra storage requirements, or registration inconsistencies that can all make the gap in cost between the two technologies look less outrageous.

STARLIGHT™ UV LED Screen Exposure System

Starlight™ is NuArc’s versatile and affordable tabletop or stand-mounted UV LED screen exposure unit. It’s ideal for conventional exposures, and an optional CTS retrofit kit turns Starlight into a computer-to-screen (CTS) UV LED screen exposure system.

Starlight's UV LEDs save energy costs, reduce screen exposure time, speed up production, and operate at far lower temperatures than metal-halide lamps. And, unlike expensive metal-halide bulbs that require replacement every year or two, Starlight's UV LED light source can last for decades.

Product Options: 

  • CTS Retrofit Kit for SL 2331
  • CTS Retrofit Kit for SL 3140
  • Starlight Floor Stand for 23x31
  • Starlight Floor Stand for 31x40
  • Transformer to run unit at 220V/50hz (SL2331 Only)

View the TDS Sheet

CTS Imaging

Computer-to-screen (CTS) imaging takes a fundamentally different approach by utilizing digital technology to eliminate the film intermediary. Instead of printing onto film, the CTS system directly applies light-blocking material exactly where it's needed on the screen.

  • Preparation – Screens are cleaned, degreased, and coated with emulsion (like the traditional method). 
  • Processing – The artwork goes from the software package (RIP software) to the CTS unit. 
  • Imaging – The CTS machine uses inkjet heads to spray imaging material onto the emulsion-coated screen. This creates the same effect that film positives would have for the exposure process.

Pros & Cons

CTS imaging comes with its own set of advantages from eliminating the need for consumables, to superior registration accuracy, and faster turnaround times among others. The process is inherently quicker, easier, and provides consistent opacity. With less need for manual labor, the potential for minor errors slowing up the overall job decreases. 

 

However, these benefits do come with trade-offs. CTS systems need a bigger up-front investment, costing roughly 3x more than traditional exposure units (~$15,000). Incorporating this technology also introduces a steeper learning curve for operators and creates a dependency on digital systems, making equipment downtime a production risk that shops must plan for. Because of this, you will see most high-end shops have a hybrid setup of both types. 

i-Image S™ Computer-to-Screen (CTS) Imaging System

M&R’s i-Image S features the same software, printhead, output quality, and image area as the groundbreaking i-Image ST-36-1, but with a smaller footprint, exceptional pricing, and the ability to image up to 100 screens per shift, it’s the ideal choice for small-to-medium size print shops. i-Image S quickly generates opaque images up to 51 x 66 cm (20” x 26”) on screen frames up to 66 x 91 cm (26” x 36”). And it’s designed to fit through an 81 cm (32") doorway.

Product Options:

  • 11"x15" Pusher Frame (Copperhead Mini-2 Scrns.)
  • 15"x23" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 9"x16")
  • 20"x24" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 14"x15")
  • 21"x28" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 15"x18")
  • 22"x27" Pusher Frame (Copperhead Size)
  • 23"x31-33" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 17"x21")
  • 23"x31-33" Pusher Frame400(Max Image Area 17"x21")
  • 25"x33-36" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 19"x23")
  • 25"x33-36" Pusher Frame400(Max Image Area 19"x23")
  • 25"x36" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 19"x26")
  • 26"x36" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 20"x26")
  • 26"x43" Pusher Frame(Max Image Area 20"x33")
  • Custom Pusher Frame
  • Custom Pusher Frame for Image ST (2UP)
  • Custom Pusher Frame for Image ST (4UP)
  • i-Image ST Transformer (To run unit on 110V power)

View TDS

Looking at 2025 & The Future

As it stands currently, traditional film exposure is still vastly the go-to option for most shops because of its low barrier to entry. But there has been a shift recently, as more and more companies are investing in CTS imaging systems. Reducing manual labor is always a plus, and the quality-of-life advantages CTS imaging gives you becomes almost necessary as your operation grows. It is estimated that over 50% of medium-to-large sized shops will have adopted CTS imaging by 2027, if they aren’t there already. 

 

There will also be more advancements in CTS technology, making it a more robust option. Kiwo’s LX series, for example, no longer requires inkjet heads to spray imaging material. Instead, it exposes the emulsion using light from lasers, giving it the capability to capture at 1270 DPI and up to 2540 DPI resolutions. Considering that most imaging systems only yield 300-700 DPI, this represents to us an evolution of imaging technology and a glimpse of what is to come

Concluding THoughts

Ultimately, the decision you end up making with your exposure process has to be the decision best for your unique set of conditions and projected growth. From budgeting to space constraints, everything matters. Traditional film positives are still the most practical choice for startups, even though the technology of CTS is evolving. When considering reducing downtime or getting around difficulties associated with manual labor, CTS will give you that extra functionality that positions it as a necessity and not a luxury for your shop.

 

At SPR, we understand different situations have different applicable solutions and we are here to help you find what your best solution is. Having access to quality equipment and supplies is pivotal, and we strive to provide you with the best option, whichever route you choose. SPR is the partner in your corner for both equipment and supplies – we’ll help you get what makes sense for you now & in the future.